April 26, 2003
Three years go...
Three years ago, on these days, I was sitting down with technical manager of Khordad newspaper which was just a street south of Asr-e Azadegan - the newspaper where I used to write a daily column. Khordad daily had the best website among all 15,16 newspaper that were being published in Iran those day. he was explaining how they upload the updated database very night and how the database is updated everynight.
Suddenly somebody called him, he left the room and got back a few seconds later. He apologized and continued to talk, but his face was wierd and he was acting strangely. I don't remember what I asked that he quietly told me that the newspaper is closed down and they don't need to worry about upload the new files. I was shocked. All 13 reformist papers were ordered to shut down in a single ungly letter that was faxed to all of them by the justice department of Tehran . Asr-e Azadegan was among them too.
Now after three years, everything has changed. People don't tend to buy papers, don't like to talk politics and don't like the man they voted anymore. Moreover, almost all of their top journalists, from the owners, editor-in-chief, columnists, satirists, cartoonists, reporters, stringers, and even some marketing agents, have been arrested and have spended some time in jail since then--from several decades to a few weeks.
Although many of them are free now, but virtually none of them are politically active. Since then, hardliners have made up huge files, containing every possible accusation they might have come up, for about every possible man or women who might have been of a little influence on the society, by his or her thoughts, writings, speeches and actions.
The last part is the worst of it, during all this time that handsome president thet we chose, two times, has been silently watched all this and have been kept giving all of them legitimacy. This is the most painful part...
Posted by hoder at April 26, 2003 2:26 PM
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I'm tracking what's happening in the Iranian blogging circuit. I'm fascinated by it because I see a lot of similarities between the Iranian and Indian blogging communities.
---------
Dear Hooman,
Thank you for your very thoughtful and well crafted reply. This is very helpful to me. In America right now there's a big flap going on because a senator made public statements about a law that deals with homosexuality. He (Senator Santorum) stated the very basic traditional point of view that homosexuality is illegal. He has since endured a mounting assault that is crying out for his resignation. He is a Christian who holds to the traditional Christian teaching on sexuality that homosexuality is sinful. But in this country homosexuals are highly organized and political. From my own point of view as a priest I hold to the traditional position and I feel strongly that we must hold Christians to that standard and use Church discipline (ultimately excommunication) to enforce it. But I'm now wondering if we can expect the state to enforce a law that we hold as Christians for everyone else? From a natural law point of view I think homosexuality is destructive for socieity whether one is a Christian, Muslim, Jew or even an atheist. But you see the problem. How would you young Iranians want to see this kind of issue dealt with in the state? By the way, my parish is All Saints in Charlottesville, VA. Home of the Univeristy of Virginia, aka, The Hoos!
---------
Fr. Glenn,...
As far as I know, the constitution does not give the state any responsibility to deal with a sin like atheism. Based on the constitution, every person in Iran has the right to choose her/his religion and has the right to have her/his own ideas. Moreover, based on the texts of Islam (at least the Shia version of Iran) you can not simply punish someone who rejects the existance of god (heathen?). Apart from one case: the state is allowed to make a move against a "Comatant/Belligerent/war-monger saracen" person (I don't know how to translate it). It means you can punish a non-believer only if he has been hostile against you (or the country). Therefore in a normal country people of every religion and belief can live together peacefully. But as you see, that is a very vague, undefined and general term, and a non-elected theocratic judiciary system like the one in Iran can always accuse opponents of being a (1) non-believer and (2) someone who is risky for the national security and then put her/him into jail (very similar to the middle-ages europe). In today's Iran you are free to believe whatever you like, as long as you don't disturb the rule of the clerics. The problem for people is they want total freedom which is clearly against the interests of the rulling clerics.
---------
I'd like to get the perspective of you young Iranian bloggers on the issue of sin and crime. You have lived in a Theocracy and I live in a secular state - USA. I'm a traditional Anglican priest and therefore I belive I and other Christians are obligated to Christian Ethic. Many behaviors that Islam considers sin, we would consider sin as well. But for us the greatest sin would be atheism, which for us would specifically be a rejection of the Trinity. I assume that for Isalm the greatest sin would be atheism, but that would be for you a rejection of Allah. Now here's my question: Should all sin be a crime that the State should punish? If all sin is a crime that the State should punish, how can we live in the same State?
---------
Dave, yea things in the US are no where near as bad in Iran right now but ya gotta admit things like the Patriot Act and the new Homeland Defense Bearu have an awful lot of potential to make them so....
---------
I believe that the biggest change for Iranians (especially the young generation - who are the majority of the people) is to understand that "they themselves" are the ones who can change the country. I sense that most young people understand this now, while it was not part of people's belief in the past generations. Traditionally Iranians were used to live under a king, and people had learnt how to keep their private life separate from public life; in other words, they had learnt how to live their own life while not disturbing the guy who's rulling the country. Current rulling clerics also belong to that old generation, and they are unable to understand the change. I appraise (?) Khatami's presidency as worthy only if he and his government manage to change the way people look at their government.
---------
Three years ago we thought thing look very sketchy and unstable, but right now its even more critical for people down there. There is not much that i can say about it, all I can do is HOPE like hell for things to get better as the time passes by. But I know one thing for sure, and thats the fact that a large number of people still like their presidents, even though he did not do much for people, but at least their political point of view is broad enough to understand that the ones who should be blamed are not neither the president nor the congress. even a 15 years old kid can easily see this! iranians are open minded...
دوباره میسازمت وطن
---------
I don't agree with Brent, I don't think there is any paralell at all between Iranian politics and the U.S. If we don't like the president we elected then in 4 years we can elect a different one. Not so in Iran.
I think the leaders in Iran may have the right idea but the wrong target. The right idea, in that perhaps those who pose the greatest threat to the security and well being of that nation should be rounded up, charged, jailed, oppressed for the good of the majority in Iran. Of course they have the wrong target, for it is the present rulers themselves who should be rounded up, charged, jailed. The other day on my George Carlin day by day calender George said "We don't need a president, we should have a king. And every couple of years if he isn't doing a good job, we should kill him" I don't agree with George there, but if there is no outlet for the will of the people to change their government, as there very well is in the U.S., Brent, then eventualy the people in Iran will make an outlet. I don't expect it to be pretty when it happens.
---------
Yea, we Americans seem to have made similar mistakes with voting in Bush, here is to hoping that come re-election time that somebody else better than him will come into office...
Good luck, hope things turn out well for those of you in Iran.
---------
I hate what has happened to the papers in the past few years, but I don't blame president Khatami. Everyone knows he's weak & has got no power to change everything in one day, but I'm sure his silence does not mean he agrees with whatever the conservatives are doing. If he increases the speed of the reform, he will either be assessinated or something like Banisadr will happen to him. If he gets killed then what? Shall we wait for Bush's army? Conservatives are always waiting for something to happen and find an excuse to announce "Special Conditions" (curfew? military rule) in the country. I believe it's only because of khatami's government that conservatives are 'pretending' they respect the law. Law had absolutely no meaning before 2nd of Khordad.
---------
Note:
* Required
The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments: <a> <b> <i>. To make line and paragraph breaks, press return (don't use <br> or <p>).
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.