August 4, 2004

Surprise: Georgia university brings blogs to Toronto

The best thing about the conference for me was that I finally met Jeff Jarvis, who, like an older brother, has always supported me, despite our political differences. It was also very great to meet Rebecca MacKinnon, Jay Rosen and Jim Elve in person. (I had met Dan Gilmore in Vienna last summer)

So, aside from these personal aspects, I am glad that some of the high-profile Canadian bloggers finally got a chance to meet and share their thoughts -- and get some local press.

As I said last night and David Akin confirmed it, blogs are not as known -- never mind popular -- in Canada as they are in the States and part of it could be because the majority of mainstream Canadian journalists have not been able to understand this new medium and how they can use it for their own journalistic purposes. Therefore they see it as an unreliable, teenage-oriented hobby, same as chat rooms, instant messenger, etc.

We Canadian bloggers should think of creative ways to talk more about blogs and its socio-political implications, so the public could gradually understand why blogs are important and how they can use them for their own purposes.

One of the greatest ways to start, I think, is to quote from Canadian blogs -- and also introduce them this way -- in hip weekly magazines such as Now and Eye. Now, for example, has a technology page every week which could be great starting point for such thing.

P.S: I forgot to say that the five minute time for each of the Global Aspects panelists in the latest possible panel, while everyone was having dinner, was probably not a good idea. However, in such conference, that was even a big success: Who else in Georgia would even care about the outside world, let alone international blogs. So, special thanks to Leonard Witt, for his brilliant idea to bring blogs to traditional journalists, and then both of them to Toronto, which one might guess, due to its diverse society, would embrace blogs more than others.

Posted by hoder at August 4, 2004 12:51 PM

Comments
I second with Jim. In my blogging experience I have found out that even American readers are far more likely to leave comments than their Canadian counterparts. It is because there are more opinionated people among them. Americans are more expressive than Canadians too, and they feel comfortable about it. As Jim mentions, you can tell that from their bumper-stickers, T-shirt decals, front-lawn signs and flags. No wonder that this culture produces more bloggers! Don't forget ego and being opinionated can easily end up in self-publication. I want to play devil's advocate here too. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that there are fewer blogs (proprtionally) in Canada than the United States, but I haven't seen any statistics indicating Americans have more bloggers (proportional to the population) than Canadians. the majority of mainstream Canadian journalists have not been able to understand this new medium and how they can use it for their own journalistic purposes. Is there some numbers to back this argument up? I know of quite a few Canadian journalists who follow Canadian blogs and some even keep their own blogs.
- By: WhoMan on August 10, 2004
---------
yo- your blog was on NPR - congrats.
- By: praktike on August 8, 2004
---------
I've been thinking a bit more about that question, Hossein. While I still think that population differences have a lot to do with the perception that blogging is not as well-known in Canada as it is in the US, I think there is another important reason. Political opinion in the US is much more polarized than here in Canada with bloggers on each end of the political spectrum more strident and less willing to listen to the other side's point of view. This could indicate a level of frustration that is exemplified in more opinionated blogging. I think that more Canadians that Americans are relatively satisfied with their government and the status quo and consequently aren't publishing as many angry blog posts. I suspect that for Iranians who are very dissatified with their government and have fewer other means of expressing their frustration, blogs are neccessary for free speech. Canadians do not feel that they have the same problem as far as freedom of speech is concerned. The US Patriot Act has stifled free speech even in the "land of the free" and blogs are speaking up in reaction to that. As we've all seen, the busiest blogs and comments sections are those where an argument of some sort is taking place. Canadians like to think of themselves as civil, level-headed and non-argumentative - peacekeepers rather than warriors. I suppose it might just be that happy, peace-loving Canadian blogs don't stir the pot as much as those from other parts of the world where the population is less content with their political situation.
- By: Jim Elve on August 6, 2004
---------
Post a comment
bold (ctrl-shft-B)italics (ctrl-shft-T)link (ctrl-shft-A)
Name*:   
Email*:
URL:


Note:
* Required
The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments: <a> <b> <i>. To make line and paragraph breaks, press return (don't use <br> or <p>).
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.