April 5, 2005
New Iranian opposition: U.S. adopts new approach
I'm not a big a fan of Mr. sazegara. Despite some of his leadership skills (mainly courage and connections), many in Iran don't find him a trustable politician.
Ordinary Iranians can hardly find it genuine when someone with strong previous ties, both politically and financially, to the core of the regime until eight or nine years ago, suddenly becomes an opposition figure, willing to work with conservative think-tanks close to the Bush administration. They also see this as a betryal to Iranian nationalistic feelings, especially when they suspect someone has joined a force that could seek violent change in Iran for his or her personal benefits.
However, as an outsider, I'm glad to see the Bush administration has finally realized that the self-proclaimed opposition groups, with fake constituency inside Iran, not only have been far from effective, but also has only harmed the U.S. by their unrealistic and most of the times stupid actions. (You may want to watch LA-based satellite TV stations for five minutes to see my point.)
Apart from my personal judgment about Mr. sazegara and his friends, I believe that American think-tanks and decision makers would benefit a lot by getting advice from such figures who -- their credibility aside-- at least have not lost touch with the reality of Iran by living and working in Tehran until very recently.
At the same time, when I see the Americans have abandoned their tough and ideologically charged positions against anyone who has had ties with the Islamic regime in Tehran (Mr. sazegara has been actively involved in the top level military, security, and industrial institutions of the Islamic regime in the early 80s), I don't understand why they still refuse to to engaging directly with the current Iranian leadership.
Posted by hoder at April 5, 2005 2:18 PM
Spending American money and resources on people/groups like these will not help the US. government in Iran. Iranian people know their friends and foes well. They know anybody who goes or has gone "to bed" with the USA or the Mullahs can't be trustworthy.
I find it ironical that most of the so called Iranian reformers and champions of democracy are the ones who once served this barbaric regime in suppressing its own people. These people, be it army commanders, journalists or ministers, should not think that Iranian people forgive and forget. Hopefully, they will have to pay for their action one day.
Pity on us if our saviors are a bunch with such a past. I think Farhad’s comments very much reflect the thinking of many Iranians!
---------
Sazegara went straight to work for the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and highly pro-Israeli front. What makes you think these people care a bit about what's good for Iran and Iranians? No, these people are not the way forward.
---------
Ali & Hoder-
As to why the U.S. refuses to engage directly with the current Iranian leadership: There seems to be refusal on both sides. Both have their reasons. IRI's reasons appear to be steeped in Islamic rhetoric along with a desire to protect their oil interests (A-ha! The truth comes out!). The U.S.'s reasons for refusal for direct diaglogue appear to be that slow-burn affect from the hostage crisis (and being called the Great Satan probably wasn't a good thing), coupled with present-day lack of trust from a myriad of issues, ranging from Iran's not so stellar human rights travesties to nuclear arms issues.
---------
Hossein...this is a direct quote from you above and some may argue it describes YOU! ..."Ordinary Iranians can hardly find it genuine when someone with strong previous ties, both politically and financially, to the core of the regime until eight or nine years ago, suddenly becomes....."
---------
Hoder I am shocked by how naive you are. First of all American foreign policy is not guided by humanitarian motives, it never has been and never will be. That's just not the nature of the way things work. Why do you expect so much from the American government in Iran. How can you expect anything from these people? As for your last sentence, it's' more than obvious why they don't engage directly with the leadership in Iran, because when has America ever tolerated an independent regime, which is not subservient to its interests, particularly in a part of the world which they consider their domain (middle eastern petroleum reserves). Your aspirations and hopes are one thing, but never be naive or confused on the reality of these political affairs.
---------
Note:
* Required
The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments: <a> <b> <i>. To make line and paragraph breaks, press return (don't use <br> or <p>).
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.