December 14, 2005
What's with the new anti-Israeli rhetoric
Having read Kayhan newspaper's editorial, it's now obvious that the new anti-Israeli line of the Ahmadinejad and his allies is a change in policy, not a random personal rant by Ahmadinejad. But why this and why now?
- Diversion: Iran, because of the deep internal rows especially among conservatives, has become a very dysfunctional state and the latest disasters (plane crash and Tehran's air pollution) are only two visible sings of that. So it makes sense for the government to divert the attention of the people inside Iran and the global community from these horrible incidents. Also, Ahmadinejad is trying to distract his base from the promises he'd given about improving people's living standard and distributing the oil revenue equally among the populous.
- Seeking support for nuclear program: It's very easy to become popular in a Muslim county, even among it's educated middle-class (if the had such thing), by ranting against Israel. The fundamentalists in Iran, who now effectively run the entire country, think they'd need the Arab world's public support for preventing stronger international pressure, sanctions or even targeted military attack. Ahmadinjead is a populist and his advisers have shown him how to manipulate unsophisticated public opinion in Arab countries when it comes to Israel.
- Ousting moderate diplomats: There are still many reform-minded and moderate top and middle managers in the new government from the good old days of Khatami. It's obviously very hard for Ahmadinjead to get rid of all of them. However he can say things that would embarrass the moderate diplomats and make it impossible for them to stay. No one wants to be part of a diplomacy machine which is already condemned by the UN and is labeled as racist and fundamentalist.
Comments
Ahmadinejad reminds me of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, et. al. The continued strife keeps them in the limelight and in power. Without that strife, they are nothing.
I remember meeting a Persian woman in San Diego some years back. She was very well-spoken, very sane, and was very much against the conflicts occurring in the Middle East. Not one word of vitriol against Israel came out of her mouth.
I think the Persians should rise up and oust those pretenders and take their country back.
- By: hundfduhrer99 on December 15, 2005
- By: hundfduhrer99 on December 15, 2005
---------
"good old days of Khatami" what the f*ck is the matter with you. you are as sick as all the other bache mullas
- By: bijan daneshmand on December 15, 2005
- By: bijan daneshmand on December 15, 2005
---------
"good" old days? Really? maybe for he likes of you, but not for decent Iranians.
- By: Iranian on December 15, 2005
- By: Iranian on December 15, 2005
---------
This is a well reasoned analysis -- but why didn't you do this type of thoughtful articulation in your Persian blog??
- By: Bahram on December 15, 2005
- By: Bahram on December 15, 2005
---------
Hoder- Even if one ignored the underlying racism of your claim about the "unsophisticated public opinion in Arab countries", none of what you say in this regard makes any sense. Public opinion in various Arab countries is very much against Israeli policies, but you should know very well that that has had no impact on the way Arab States have dealt with Israel. If public opinion mattered to the Arab states, then Iraq would not have been kept under sanctions for over a decade and attacked with the help of Arab states. Maybe you should get more sophisticated in your public opinions!
- By: Niki on December 14, 2005
- By: Niki on December 14, 2005
---------
Post a comment
Note:
* Required
The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments: <a> <b> <i>. To make line and paragraph breaks, press return (don't use <br> or <p>).
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.