re: online republication; they just might mind... which brings this notion to mind; a mail-list. much can be disseminated online a little more discreetly that way. in fact, passing URLs out in a mail-list may be considered nonpublic and effectively 'nonpublishing'. maybe. i don't know, just a thought. (...then i think to look closely at top... -it seems you already have a mail-list... -never mind!) :D ...regardless, i'd be interested to read the article.
- By: John Farwell on April 11, 2006

Hossein: Not having read the New Scientist article, how do your opinions square with the concerns Amir Taheri expressed about the location of nuclear facilities in earthquake zones, environmental implications for countries on the Bushehr peninsula and the absense of any plans for the disposal of spent radioactive materials. And the biggest question of all: if Iran only has about 7 years' worth of fissionable materials to supply civilian purposes, why bother... ...other than to build arms?
- By: Lynne T on April 10, 2006

From dimension of Persian politeness, do use the dictionary software. Not a bad idea. No hard feelings
- By: dariush kermani on April 10, 2006

hossein, your spelling is really bad - so many careless typos you need to sort it out: "zioism" "porblems". Its really noticeable and not excusable considering that you can edit posts very easily. Its the first rule of good journalism - accuracy.
- By: anon on April 10, 2006

I read it in the paper version of the magazine. A good article!
- By: Stephen Mackenzie on April 8, 2006