August 18, 2006

Crack down on satellite dishes in Tehran

The police of Tehran is heavily cracking down on satellite dishes in populated areas such as Shahrak-e gahrb etc.
Holding warrants, they enter buildings and collect satellite dishes and LMBs (not sure about the digital receivers) from their rooftops. In some cases they've also also fined them for over a thousand dollars.

The perception is this time they are quite serious, although they've done this almost every summer. It's been part of the seasonal crack down on the 'Western' phenomenas, under the pressure from the influential radical religious groups.

But this time, I believe, it's different. It appears to be part of a larger policy to control all channels of information and establish a total monopoly on the emerging new media.

The internet censorship is intensified, newspapers are controlled using secret orders and requests, and now satellite dishes.

But I think it'd be extremely difficult to crack down on satellite access. Because it's a direct technology, unlike internet which needs mediators as ISPs; the equipment is relatively cheap and increasingly available through trafficking, and Iranian TV has yet to fully satisfy the young urban population.

But there's also something positive about this for the moderates: The disillusioned middle-class which either didn't take part in the last elections or voted for Ahmadinejad hoping for change, can now feel the change in their daily life.

The more people can feel the difference between the reformist government and the new one, the more it's likely they participate more in the upcoming elections.

Posted by hoder at August 18, 2006 4:31 AM| TrackBack

Comments
I agree with Andrew, the election in the I.R. are a joke. Most of the reformist are a bigger joke. Regime change only solution for Iran.
- By: hooman on August 22, 2006
---------
Internet and news papers are much more dangerous to the regime than satellite programs (especially Iranian made). Unfortunately, I haven't seen anything but cheap (music) programs and absurd political "monologues" on Iranian channels. It's sad that these programs are forming the alternative for the government media, for some Iranian who doesn't have access to anything else.
- By: Hydra on August 20, 2006
---------
LMB? Is it a martian drug?
- By: Qmars on August 20, 2006
---------
Completely disagree with Andrew on what he said, not taking part in the elections means your in for total change in the system, but how many of those who didn't vote would be willing to put their lives on the line for another revolution or complete change of system if it came down to it?! Did I just here you say very little? Ok so then not taking part in those elections proves absolutely nothing, and those who didn't vote should stop whining because they chose the path of least resistance.
- By: Excalibur on August 18, 2006
---------
and Mr Harringtons -what the f**k do you know about Iran eh? pray tell, what qualifies you to disagree with the comments of an Iranian? What? You've got a degree from the LSE? SOAS? Oxford? some fat-assed IR Centre/Institute/wank bucket in the States? Read a couple of books lately? This is why I don't like blogs, a bunch of unqualifieds (including Mr Hoder) talking shit and they pull the wool over the eyes of unsuspecting publishers like the Guardian and the New York Times who dont know anybody who can tell them any better. Shame.
- By: anon on August 18, 2006
---------
Taking part in elections where the candidates have been handpicked by a "supreme leader" is a joke Hoder.
- By: Andrew Harringtons on August 18, 2006
---------
Post a comment
bold (ctrl-shft-B)italics (ctrl-shft-T)link (ctrl-shft-A)
Name*:   
Email*:
URL:


Note:
* Required
The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments: <a> <b> <i>. To make line and paragraph breaks, press return (don't use <br> or <p>).
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.