September 25, 2006
Ganji dismisses Iran - U.S. dialogue
In his latest opinion piece, Akbar Ganji, rejects the prospects of direct negotiations which he calls them 'secret deal' with the U.S. -- as if diplomatic negotiations in the 'beautiful and amazing' United States or elsewhere have ever been public.
We believe the government in Tehran is seeking a secret deal with the United States. It is willing to make any concession, provided that the United States promises to remain silent about the regime's repressive measures at home. We don't want war; nor do we favor such a deal. We hope that the regime will not be allowed to suppress its people, foment a crisis in the region or continue with its nuclear adventurism.
Interestingly enough, Reza Pahlavi, last week, suggested almost the same thing:
Clearly, war is an option rejected and which, as far as I am concerned, must be taken off the table; equally ineffective, is the process of endless diplomacy which has been fruitlessly pursued, now for several years -- with the full prestige, backing and weight of the European Union, Russia, the UN and the United States. The net result of this process has been that the militant clerical regime of Iran is today not only closer to reaching its enrichment objectives, but also recklessly emboldened by the lack of resolve it has seen amongst the practitioners of international diplomacy.
Posted by hoder at September 25, 2006 4:18 PM| TrackBack
Alooooo Hossein agha ====
why do u play with the words. Ganji's position is not something new. many people blieve there should be a direct negotiation between Iran and US in order to find a way out of this dead-lock. but at the same time they belive this negotiation should be done through a formal political chanel where there is no "secret deal" against the public and national interests.
therefore, what you are getting into is not Ganji's point of view but just playing with the word at your end.
i am having problem to see Ganji's position is same or even close to Reza Pahlavi. these 2 are 2 different entities and may never get close to each other. one is after the delusory monarchy and the other is pushing for real democratic republic.
so what are you after? is that a kind of fishing?
---------
I am not surprised that Mr. Ganji’s position is getting closer to Reza Pahlavi. Soon every body will get close to him. Reza Pahlavi knows what he is talking about and has been right all along. Good for Ganji! We need more people like him!
---------
It seems like you haven't even read the whole article. Contrary to what you think, he supports Iran - US dialogue. However, he is against a "secret deal" between the two governments:
"It is both possible and desirable to solve the problems between the United States and Iran through direct talks. Such diplomacy will best serve the interests of the American and Iranian people if it is conducted in a transparent fashion. This transparency would not only make it impossible for advocates of war to increase tensions but also would help isolate them. Iranian democrats are opposed to secret diplomacy."
---------
Dear Hossein… Ganji’s stance against a “secret deal” is no different to that of many state reformists and politicians inside Iran. In recent years we’ve heard this put in many ways by parliamentarians and close allies of ex-President Khatami that the conservative establishment wants ties with the US but they want this done behind closed doors and they don’t want reformist politicians such as Khatami to have any part of it.
He is asking for transparency and the Iranian people’s right to know. In no way can this piece be read as a rejection of negotiations.
Also take a look at this piece Ganji wrote for the Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/20/AR2006092001583.html
Ganji Writes:
“It is both possible and desirable to solve the problems between the United States and Iran through direct talks. Such diplomacy will best serve the interests of the American and Iranian people if it is conducted in a transparent fashion.”
---------
Note:
* Required
The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments: <a> <b> <i>. To make line and paragraph breaks, press return (don't use <br> or <p>).
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.