August 24, 2007

Haleh Esfandiari and NED

I know speaking against Haleh Esfandiari is like suicide these days. After all, with the help of her mostly American and Iranian neoliberal allies (especially Washington Post's Robin Wright whose love for Esfandiari, for some reason, surpasses that of Esfandiari's own daughter), has become a symbolic victim of the 'most repressive regime on the planet.'

But let's be honest for a moment. If an American scholar served , in Tehran, as the head of a prominent think-tank, very close to the heart of the Iranian policy making machine, and started travelling back and forth to the U.S. and tried to establish contacts and with dissident Americans (let's say the leftists) and invited them to Tehran to speak for highest Iranian policy making, top officers of the Revolutionary Guards and intelligence officers, how would the U.S., even the most liberal one like Jimmy Carter, would treat him or her?

On top of that, Haleh Esfandiari was the first Iranian fellow at the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) in 1995, as the first group of NED fellows. (She was followed by Hossein Bashirieh, Ramin Jahanbegloo, Siamak Namazi, Ali Afshari and Manouchehr Mohammadi ever since.)

And we all know about NED's roles and functions in countries where the U.S. wants to bring about its favorite governments such as in Venezuella and the rest. Some even suggest that the links between the CIA and NED are undeniable. "A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA," says Allen Weinstein, who helped draft the legislation establishing NED in 1991. (Read the entire Le Monde Diplomatique's article on the links between NED and the CIA. )

Given what we know about NED today, I believe, anyone in any country who has had any ties with NED and its affiliate organisations (International Republican Institute, National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, American Center for International Labor Solidarity and Center for International Private Enterprise) deserves to be charged and fairly and justly prosecuted.

I emphasize on the process to be just and fair because I think Iran has sometimes ignored some of its own laws when it comes to such cases. For example, withholding Esfandiari's passport and therefore keeping her in Iran without prosecuting her was totally wrong and illegal.

But more or less the rest of her case was handled fairly and legally, given the laws in Iran, that like like in many countries post 9/11, give the right to the judge to extend the time a detainee can be held without charges. But Esfandiari had a lawyer, has contacts with her mother and, at it appears, was treated well in detention.

Now perhaps Danny Postel would like to write another piece for openDemocracy and compare me this time with Adolf Hitler. I wonder what he and other Christopher Hitchens clones think about the NED.

Posted by hoder at August 24, 2007 6:10 AM| TrackBack

Comments
I used to think that you were a new voice of Iranian moderation. Your support of the incarceration of Esfandari, and your support of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, whose activities include blowing up the Jewish Community Center of Buenos Aires Argentina just mark you as a regime supported puppet. We have thousands of academics in our universities who hate America yet profit off it at the same time. We dont engage in the quaint Iranian custom of keeping them hostage. If you really want to do something brave, contact IRG leader Imad Mugniyeh. He can send you into Israel, although I assume your mission wont be as pleasant as your prior visits to Israel
- By: Herbert Kaine on August 28, 2007
---------
Good pt, Hoder. To go a bit further, she was affiliated with war-mongering, regime-changing neo-cons. Her husband, an Iranian Jew, is an "expert" on Iran. The deck is pretty well stacked against her. To me, she seems like a traitress whose motives "just happen" to COHENcide with those of Israel and its proxy, America. BTW, pls put me on your "blogs by Iranians" site as I'm Iranian.
- By: IFA on August 27, 2007
---------
I agree with you that all the people you mentioned have very shady pasts. We know about the NED project and all those neo-con/right-wing think tanks in the US. But the other side of the coin is the fact that if the Islamic Republic had opened up a little and provided opportunities for these people to do their research or whatever in Iranian universities and institutions perhaps they were not in a position to develop such shady pasts. Haleh Esfandiari et al are academicians. They are educated in the West and therefore are not compatible with a medieval way of thinking that is preached in Iran today. The way I see it they've been used as ponds in an elaborate game of chess between the West and the East to give a warning to Americans and all their Iranian cronies: the Western way of thinking is not tolerated in Iran and they’re willing to go to any length to stop people who might have some other ideas about running a country/society. Just look at the pressure they put upon their own opposition groups within the country that have accepted the idea of an Islamic Republic but want to run it in a different way.
- By: Mohammad on August 27, 2007
---------
Post a comment
bold (ctrl-shft-B)italics (ctrl-shft-T)link (ctrl-shft-A)
Name*:   
Email*:
URL:


Note:
* Required
The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments: <a> <b> <i>. To make line and paragraph breaks, press return (don't use <br> or <p>).
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.