November 22, 2007

When politicians love journalists

I beg to say that the main premise on which Sadeq Saba's new analysis is built upon is just false.

In his piece about the harsh criticism against Ahmadinejad, published in a newspaper in iran called Jomhoori-e Eslami, he argues that support for Ahmadinejad is diminishing among within the senior leadership of Iran.

That's becoming an increasingly popular theme these days and the way I read it is that the U.S./UK official line against Iran is slightly shifting towards exploiting the remaining limited potentials of Rafsanjanists in breaking the political unity and common will behind the nuclear programme and particularly the decision not to give up on the enrichment.

The British/American alliance has now publicly started to give a louder voice to the Rafsanjanists inside Iran (from Shirin Ebadi to Hassan Rohani) and outside (almost all Democrat-leaning figures such as Abbas Milani and Akbar Ganji) in order to widen the potential differences of opinions among the key decision-making figures and institutions.

So it doesn't matter to Mr. Saba that painting Jomhouri-e Eslami as a newspaper that reflects Khamenei's positions is totally false. One only needs to go back and see during the previous elections and afterwards it has always been Rafsanjani who has enjoyed the full support of the newspaper, not Ahmadinejad.

In this context, it is very predictable to see such attacks from one of Rafsanjani's most faithful media allies. And it's not event the first time Jomhouri-e Eslami is diong this. (See an eariler report from January 2007 for example.)

What is happening in the past few months is that Khamenei is becoming more and more supportive of Ahmadinejad in private and public, at the same time that he keeps his distance with him. So Khamenei supports him more while he also criticised him more. (For instance, read the transcript of his speech for the government cabinet a few months ago.)

Mind you that I didn't vote for Ahmadinejad and I have my criticism of many of his actions and rhetoric. However, I can't close my eyes on such obviously inaccurate and politically-motivated journalism that has shamelessly become so common in the Euro-American media.

Apparently Washington post's Robin Wright has become their role model.

Posted by hoder at November 22, 2007 3:30 PM| TrackBack

Comments
The brawl between Iranian factions that lazy journalists call "hardliners" and "prgmatists", and the Western support of the latter against the former, is much like its parallel in Lebanon. Good thing Lebanes-style political assassinations haven't gripped Iran yet. Rafsanjani is favored by the West (the World Bank) because he's the Fouad Siniora of Iran.
- By: Majeed G. on November 24, 2007
---------
I agree with you !Leaving out the account whether Ahamdinejad's actions were appropriate,we just kown that the vocation of media is to report images all-around for average people to realize what happend around us.Then we can think about our world,our family.With too excessive criticism,it would influence the fleeings of the matter more or less.Just as bereaving our right of have our own point of view.
- By: marsher on November 23, 2007
---------
Dear Hossein, is it me or it feels you just argue the "Rafsanjanists" as you put it is writing this critic! what I can't understand in your short write up. what is your conclusion and what was your thesis in this write up? sorry dude you lost me. the only thing I got that Mr. Sadegh Saba should not write anything about diminishing President AN supposrt! if he does he is in "Rafsanjani's" league? or am I missing what you intended to say!
- By: alireza on November 23, 2007
---------
Post a comment
bold (ctrl-shft-B)italics (ctrl-shft-T)link (ctrl-shft-A)
Name*:   
Email*:
URL:


Note:
* Required
The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments: <a> <b> <i>. To make line and paragraph breaks, press return (don't use <br> or <p>).
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.