March 18, 2008

Mossadegh plays with fire, says New York Times in 1953

The New York Times published the following editorial in 1953, literally two days before the CIA coup against Mohammad Mossadegh. You just need to replace Mossadegh's name with Ahmadinejad and turn the context from nationalization of oil to nuclear programme in order to see how little has changed the way the Americans see those who resist:

Mossadegh plays with fire

Source: The New York Times, Editorial

August 15, 1953

The world has so many trouble spots these days that one is apt to pass over the odd one here and there to preserve a little peace of mind. It would be well, however, to keep an eye, on Iran, where matters are going from bad to worse, thanks to the machinations of Premier Mossadegh.

Some of us used to ascribe our inability to persuade Dr. Mossadegh of the validity of our ideas to the impossibility of making him understand or see things our way. We thought of him as a sincere, well-meaning, patriotic Iranian, who had a different point of view and made different deductions from the same set of facts. We now know that he is a power-hungry, personally ambitious, ruthless demagogue who is trampling upon the liberties of his own people. We have seen this onetime chamption of liberty maintain martial law, curb freedom of the press, radio, speech and assembly, resort to illegal arrests and torture, dismiss the Senate, destroy the power of the Shah, take over control of the army, and now he is about to destroy the Majlis, which is the lower house of Parliament.

His power would seem to be complete, but he has alientated the traditional ruling classes — the aristocrats, landlords, financiers and tribal leaders. These elements are anti-Communist. So is the Shah and so are the army leaders and the urban middle classes. There is a traditional, historic fear, suspicion and dislike of Russian and the Russians. The peasants, who make up the overwhelming mass of the population, are illiterate and nonpolitical. Finally, there is still no evidence that the Tudeh (Communist) party is strong enough or well enough organized, financed and led to take power.

All this simply means that there is no immediate danger of a Communist coup or Russian intervention. On the other hand, Dr. Mossadegh is encouraging the Tudeh and is following policies which will make the Communists more and more dangerous. He is a sorcerer’s apprentice, calling up forces he will not be able to control.

Iran is a weak, divided, poverty-stricken country which possesses an immense latent wealth in oil and a crucial strategic position. This is very different from neighboring Turkey, a strong, united, determined and advanced nation, which can afford to deal with the Russians because she has nothing to fear — and there the West has nothing to fear. Thanks largely to Dr. Mossadegh, there is much to fear in Iran.

Posted by hoder at March 18, 2008 7:20 PM| TrackBack

Comments
Victory in Iraq will be when the US Military puts control of Iraqi Oil into the hands of the Oil Corporations. The soldiers and taxpayers suffer for oil corporate profits while giving tax subsidies to oil corporations. What a deal we are getting from our poiliticians.
- By: Gerald L Sneirson on March 26, 2008
---------
If I remember "All The Shah's Men" rightly, Mossadeq declared martial law in response to the riots fomented by our (American) tax money, distributed by Kermit Roosevelt. Did the Times know this, or were they already the same useful idiots they were in the era of Judy Miller?
- By: Peter VE on March 21, 2008
---------
Wow. Thank-you for finding this. As an American, I read it and cringe. A question: to what actual events is the editorial pointing when it talks about Dr. Mossadegh becoming a "power-hungry, personally ambitious, ruthless demagogue who is trampling upon the liberties of his own people," and when it talks about "martial law," or curbing freedom of the press, and all the rest? I understand the bit about Mossadegh being seen as a threat by the traditional non-democratic sources of power in Iran, but I also find it interesting that the editorial doesn't mention what appears to have been the real prod for the CIA coup against Dr. Mossadegh, the threat that he would nationalize Iranian oil and throw out the giant American oil companies who controlled those oil fields.
- By: Leah on March 19, 2008
---------
Post a comment
bold (ctrl-shft-B)italics (ctrl-shft-T)link (ctrl-shft-A)
Name*:   
Email*:
URL:


Note:
* Required
The following HTML tags are allowed in your comments: <a> <b> <i>. To make line and paragraph breaks, press return (don't use <br> or <p>).
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.